quarta-feira, janeiro 04, 2006

Objectivo complicado...

O dia tem 24horas e eu gostava que a cada dia eu podesse fazer a seguinte divisão horária:

- 9h a dormir
- 9h a estudar (3+3+3)
- 3h a treinar
- 2h para refeiçoes (almoço + jantar)

Se eu conseguisse fazer isto julgo que teria altas notas nos exames, já que não me parece que alguma vez tenha conseguido estudar 9horas (efectivas...quer dizer nem efectivas nem perto disso). Claro que com esta divisão horária ficava sem tempo para tomar banho ou para deslocações, mas era uma questão de roubar umas meias horas a cada um dos blocos!

Enfim...sonhar é preciso! =)

1 comentário:

Anónimo disse...

Nove horas de trabalho - ou de estudoi é demais (desde 1890! - "Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will").
sobre a luta pelo máximo de 8 horas de trabalho (ou estudo, porque não) e a origem desse slogan em: http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/whaples.work.hours.us:
After the demise of the Knights of Labor, the American Federation of Labor (AFL) became the strongest labor union in the U.S. It held shorter hours as a high priority. The inside cover of its Proceedings carried two slogans in large type: "Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will" and "Whether you work by the piece or work by the day, decreasing the hours increases the pay." (The latter slogan was coined by Ira Steward's wife, Mary.) In the aftermath of 1886, the American Federation of Labor adopted a new strategy of selecting each year one industry in which it would attempt to win the eight-hour day, after laying solid plans, organizing, and building up a strike fund war chest by taxing nonstriking unions. The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners was selected first and May 1, 1890 was set as a day of national strikes. It is estimated that nearly 100,000 workers gained the eight-hour day as a result of these strikes in 1890. However, other unions turned down the opportunity to follow the carpenters' example and the tactic was abandoned. Instead, the length of the workweek continued to erode during this period, sometimes as the result of a successful local strike, more often as the result of broader economic forces.", ver